{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2006-48",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:6f8793c9f12f4860b6addad7091dac0ae312603584bc05adfc8e799cf6607bdd",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2006:48, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2006-48",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2006-48",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2006:48, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Allmän domstol har ansetts ha behörighet att inom ramen för prövningen av frågan om återbetalningsskyldighet till Försäkringskassan av felaktigt utgivna bidrag även pröva en invändning från bidragstagaren om att det finns skäl att efterge återbetalningsskyldigheten.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 2006."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2006-48",
  "softwareVersion": "69b221f4762cd9bf",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2006-48, RH 2006:48, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2006-48 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:a01b427b9fdf427b, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2006-48/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:6f8793c9f12f4860b6addad7091dac0ae312603584bc05adfc8e799cf6607bdd",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:6f8793c9f12f4860b6addad7091dac0ae312603584bc05adfc8e799cf6607bdd",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:08:40.895Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2006-48",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}