{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2006-19",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:a2cd523a5942fc33006a737c67bbf6c5a4583175be42b7321fffecebbb0ac503",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2006:19, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2006-19",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2006-19",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2006:19, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Hyresnämndsmål.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Det har ansetts att hon har i hyreslagens mening uppställt ett villkor om ersättning för att överlåta hyresrätten och att hon därigenom så allvarligt åsidosatt sina skyldigheter mot hyresvärden att det inte var oskäligt att låta hyresavtalet upphöra.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätts hyresrättsliga avgöranden, 2005."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2006-19",
  "softwareVersion": "49121b8dc92f2b13",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2006-19, RH 2006:19, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2006-19 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:d2c6d1b29e9de89b, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2006-19/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:a2cd523a5942fc33006a737c67bbf6c5a4583175be42b7321fffecebbb0ac503",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:a2cd523a5942fc33006a737c67bbf6c5a4583175be42b7321fffecebbb0ac503",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:16:14.973Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2006-19",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}