{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2005-71",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:7020c4db1fd5e76a2bb60f87c13269034312427a247bc18e8c4a1efac1b48d90",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2005:71, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2005-71",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2005-71",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2005:71, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Ansökan om ersättningsgaranti till bodelningsförrättare, som getts in till tingsrätten efter det att bodelningsförrättaren fattat beslut om att avsluta sin handläggning, har ansetts som för sent inkommen och har avvisats.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten över Skåne och Blekinge, 2005. Tillämpar Äktenskapsbalken."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2005-71",
  "softwareVersion": "aaee980215b2b77e",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2005-71, RH 2005:71, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2005-71 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:ac352ada9b74c718, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2005-71/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:7020c4db1fd5e76a2bb60f87c13269034312427a247bc18e8c4a1efac1b48d90",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:7020c4db1fd5e76a2bb60f87c13269034312427a247bc18e8c4a1efac1b48d90",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:02:56.590Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2005-71",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}