{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2004-78",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:30933c65d52258a20bc88c17fe3019211e77ac9a4eb1cea7e88c1954fb364437",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2004:78, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2004-78",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2004-78",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "Fråga om gäldenärens hälsotillstånd bort föranleda en annan bedömning har besvarats nekande",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Vid prövning av ansökan om skuldsanering har det ansetts att gäldenärens och hans familjs bostadskostnader varit alltför höga för att det allmänt sett skulle anses skäligt att bevilja skuldsanering.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 2004."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2004-78",
  "softwareVersion": "21bba2b5fd3c79cd",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2004-78, RH 2004:78, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2004-78 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:c789b4749dd68f1e, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2004-78/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:30933c65d52258a20bc88c17fe3019211e77ac9a4eb1cea7e88c1954fb364437",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:30933c65d52258a20bc88c17fe3019211e77ac9a4eb1cea7e88c1954fb364437",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:03:24.015Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2004-78",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}