{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2004-48",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:57e0dd5c11b946fea5fd24bcea6e933fd0c5c85d826081c9bb755f37bd65128f",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2004:48, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2004-48",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2004-48",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2004:48, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: En man har befunnits under en fyramånadersperiod ha gjort sig skyldig till dels olaga hot vid fyra skilda tillfällen mot sin f.d. hustru, dels ofredande genom att under samma period vid upprepade tillfällen ha ringt henne ett stort antal telefonsamtal.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Gärningarna har inte bedömts som grov kvinnofridskränkning utan mannen har dömts för vart och ett av de enskilda brotten.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 2004."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2004-48",
  "softwareVersion": "81a2973e1f012c13",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2004-48, RH 2004:48, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2004-48 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:2dcb7f5df20e096a, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2004-48/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:57e0dd5c11b946fea5fd24bcea6e933fd0c5c85d826081c9bb755f37bd65128f",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:57e0dd5c11b946fea5fd24bcea6e933fd0c5c85d826081c9bb755f37bd65128f",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:10:07.740Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2004-48",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}