{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2004-27",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:b419587afd2a307fefa0a64c1331c07a826b7d7efa571fa42a898726b84b0fb9",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2004:27, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2004-27",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2004-27",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2004:27, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Arbetstagare som sagts upp före arbetsgivarens konkurs har för rätt till lönegaranti ansetts skyldig att vara anmäld hos offentlig arbetsförmedling som arbetssökande under tiden mellan konkursbeslutet och den dag då han fick kännedom om detta beslut.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten över Skåne och Blekinge, 2004."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2004-27",
  "softwareVersion": "dc641ffa2ef4ff55",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2004-27, RH 2004:27, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2004-27 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:0823b9f956cfc89e, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2004-27/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:b419587afd2a307fefa0a64c1331c07a826b7d7efa571fa42a898726b84b0fb9",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:b419587afd2a307fefa0a64c1331c07a826b7d7efa571fa42a898726b84b0fb9",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:04:18.653Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2004-27",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}