{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2002-39",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:0acb4fbb33fd6e283582ba2787ad99274cd51fb8eb2a56a3a275e8c254b10cda",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2002:39, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2002-39",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2002-39",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2002:39, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Med hänsyn till allmänintresset - mordet på landets statsminister - har det ansetts försvarligt att i dagstidningar identifiera den utpekade mördaren med namn och bild samt ge offentlighet åt påståenden om att denne skulle ha gjort sig skyldig till en omfattande grov brottslighet trots att uppgifterna ansågs innefatta förtal.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 2002."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2002-39",
  "softwareVersion": "fba11ec5a3481225",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2002-39, RH 2002:39, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2002-39 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:7ffd28879618d9ad, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2002-39/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:0acb4fbb33fd6e283582ba2787ad99274cd51fb8eb2a56a3a275e8c254b10cda",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:0acb4fbb33fd6e283582ba2787ad99274cd51fb8eb2a56a3a275e8c254b10cda",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:02:01.616Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2002-39",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}