{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2002-31",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:d07a1c361c460b08b059b250c40a57123409996828928f0db6de4034baf8f18f",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2002:31, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2002-31",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2002-31",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2002:31, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: I brottmål i vilket brottmålstaxan inte var tillämplig, har ersättning för tidsspillan inte utgått till offentlig försvarare för den tid som åtgått för promenader mellan advokatkontoret och arrestlokalen, respektive domstolen.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Nedre Norrland, 2002."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2002-31",
  "softwareVersion": "a8520e275e07cfcf",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2002-31, RH 2002:31, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2002-31 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:5a2e83a4c012d2e8, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2002-31/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:d07a1c361c460b08b059b250c40a57123409996828928f0db6de4034baf8f18f",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:d07a1c361c460b08b059b250c40a57123409996828928f0db6de4034baf8f18f",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:05:11.701Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2002-31",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}