{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2002-29",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:4cb4c527af5241b5eae6b88339c3562acaa7c61759b9b4706a229d68ed9d6a4b",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2002:29, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2002-29",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2002-29",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2002:29, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Arvode till konkursförvaltare som beslutat om fortsatt drift med utnyttjande av lönegarantilagen trots att han på ett tidigt stadium av konkursen insett att det inte förelåg några affärsmässiga förutsättningar för fortsatt drift.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Västra Sverige, 2001."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2002-29",
  "softwareVersion": "9a5c670d623d4c49",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2002-29, RH 2002:29, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2002-29 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:6ae0977d0e888a8d, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2002-29/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:4cb4c527af5241b5eae6b88339c3562acaa7c61759b9b4706a229d68ed9d6a4b",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:4cb4c527af5241b5eae6b88339c3562acaa7c61759b9b4706a229d68ed9d6a4b",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:57:36.592Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2002-29",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}