{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2001-75",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:a6805686dcd13b02aeb84056c3c4495eedbcd0facd12b45dfa67d5d80a5016f9",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2001:75, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2001-75",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2001-75",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "Fråga bl.a. om, då den tilltalade redan undergick skyddstillsyn, om ny skyddstillsyn med behandlingsplan skall utdömas eller om den redan ådömda skyddstillsynen, förenad med en behandlingsplan, skall förordnas avse även de aktuella brotten",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Skyddstillsyn med behandlingsplan har i visst fall ansetts vara den lämpligaste påföljden.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Västra Sverige, 2001."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2001-75",
  "softwareVersion": "871b5fe0af0523bc",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2001-75, RH 2001:75, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2001-75 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:949dfa91386fc3e0, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2001-75/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:a6805686dcd13b02aeb84056c3c4495eedbcd0facd12b45dfa67d5d80a5016f9",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:a6805686dcd13b02aeb84056c3c4495eedbcd0facd12b45dfa67d5d80a5016f9",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:04:48.894Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2001-75",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}