{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2001-70",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:a013528dd7b85a812b3994563b9fc2a0144d93036a2475e246b4ba4e36f2dbd1",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2001:70, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2001-70",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2001-70",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2001:70, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: I brottmål, där brottmålstaxan inte var tillämplig, har tidsspillan ansetts ersättningsgill endast om den händelse eller det dröjsmål för vilket ersättning yrkas inte varit av underordnad beskaffenhet eller inneburit en obetydlig tidsåtgång.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Göta hovrätt, 2001."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2001-70",
  "softwareVersion": "db96a35e4d7212c0",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2001-70, RH 2001:70, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2001-70 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:10031516533f31fe, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2001-70/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:a013528dd7b85a812b3994563b9fc2a0144d93036a2475e246b4ba4e36f2dbd1",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:a013528dd7b85a812b3994563b9fc2a0144d93036a2475e246b4ba4e36f2dbd1",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:10:04.754Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2001-70",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}