{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2001-7",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:9ab50f97d97a23dcabd55f4db5bef94fe5540445097a638f73283538c639efeb",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2001:7, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2001-7",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2001-7",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2001:7, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Mot en fastställelsetalan om varumärkesintrång, avseende ett registrerat varumärke som består av ordet Turbovent och figurelement, har utan framgång gjorts invändning om att registreringen inte ger någon ensamrätt till ordet Turbovent på grund av bristande särskiljningsförmåga hos ordet.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Övre Norrland, 2000."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2001-7",
  "softwareVersion": "1a7ba59c82e8a864",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2001-7, RH 2001:7, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2001-7 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:52a428d83c2d894b, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2001-7/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:9ab50f97d97a23dcabd55f4db5bef94fe5540445097a638f73283538c639efeb",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:9ab50f97d97a23dcabd55f4db5bef94fe5540445097a638f73283538c639efeb",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:56:46.001Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2001-7",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}