{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2001-26",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:f1ad1a5a3e7a8c40909b9f6eb4a255ed62ec9041d17a3382ca75ecafb022b5a7",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2001:26, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2001-26",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2001-26",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2001:26, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Fråga i mål om försäkringsersättning om beviskravet vid påstått inbrott i bostad dels huruvida inbrott över huvud taget har förekommit, dels om den som påstår sig bestulen har ägt och innehaft de föremål som han gör gällande blev stulna vid inbrottet.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 2001."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2001-26",
  "softwareVersion": "882b3f5be8d07bcc",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2001-26, RH 2001:26, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2001-26 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:3f0704414eb3e448, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2001-26/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:f1ad1a5a3e7a8c40909b9f6eb4a255ed62ec9041d17a3382ca75ecafb022b5a7",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:f1ad1a5a3e7a8c40909b9f6eb4a255ed62ec9041d17a3382ca75ecafb022b5a7",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:03:58.026Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2001-26",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}