{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-92",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:484b579b078726b3c332080575487f4c546c359bd2f1a6f20a3d188618635220",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2000:92, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2000-92",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-92",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2000:92, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Tillgrepp vid fyra tillfällen av pengar ur en gemensamhetskassa på en arbetsplats har, främst med hänsyn till att gärningsmannen svikit det förtroende som visats honom, bedömts som stöld trots att gärningarna i flertalet fall avsett småbelopp.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Västra Sverige, 2000."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-92",
  "softwareVersion": "d9f24f349e3d5e4f",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2000-92, RH 2000:92, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-92 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:fd82a731b97dd961, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2000-92/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:484b579b078726b3c332080575487f4c546c359bd2f1a6f20a3d188618635220",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:484b579b078726b3c332080575487f4c546c359bd2f1a6f20a3d188618635220",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:00:19.962Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-92",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}