{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-75",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:e1501b07ad09f8e7bd799cefdc3e51d678096a5e85901293fa96595209e19f44",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2000:75, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2000-75",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-75",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2000:75, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Användande av förenklad delgivning har, med hänsyn till omständigheterna, inte ansetts vara olämpligt trots att mer än två år förflutit efter delgivningen av underrättelse om förenklad delgivning.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Göta hovrätt, 2000."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-75",
  "softwareVersion": "42991654b23d43fc",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2000-75, RH 2000:75, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-75 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:e5cf960e2cd02e47, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2000-75/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:e1501b07ad09f8e7bd799cefdc3e51d678096a5e85901293fa96595209e19f44",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:e1501b07ad09f8e7bd799cefdc3e51d678096a5e85901293fa96595209e19f44",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:00:01.460Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-75",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}