{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-6",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:7e818c2e7d2c29b3e48e9508a831e492d277ba0b2a2da5ae8500cb677ffffe7e",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2000:6, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2000-6",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-6",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2000:6, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Ansökan om återställande av försutten tid för överklagande av tingsrätts dom har bifallits på den grunden att tingsrätten åsidosatt sin skyldighet att expediera domen till målsägande, som var part, och denne inte fått del av domen inom överklagandetiden.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 2000."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-6",
  "softwareVersion": "03a9171c6441deac",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2000-6, RH 2000:6, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-6 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:a8ec140211abe8ff, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2000-6/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:7e818c2e7d2c29b3e48e9508a831e492d277ba0b2a2da5ae8500cb677ffffe7e",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:7e818c2e7d2c29b3e48e9508a831e492d277ba0b2a2da5ae8500cb677ffffe7e",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:00:24.521Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-6",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}