{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-46",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:0e492b9cdd4fd114f3fceaa2215f9f87c153ae61fa48c5d73c41ee6a2efe63b9",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2000:46, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2000-46",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-46",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2000:46, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Hyresnämndsmål.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: I tvist om rätt till förhandlingsordning visar en undersökning beträffande hyresgästernas inställning till förhandlingsordning att 30 procent var positiva, vilket har ansetts representera ett tillräckligt stort antal för att förhandlingsordning skulle fastställas.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätts hyresrättsliga avgöranden, 2000."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-46",
  "softwareVersion": "9620804c746c460b",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2000-46, RH 2000:46, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-46 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:2f352d55062beed9, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2000-46/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:0e492b9cdd4fd114f3fceaa2215f9f87c153ae61fa48c5d73c41ee6a2efe63b9",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:0e492b9cdd4fd114f3fceaa2215f9f87c153ae61fa48c5d73c41ee6a2efe63b9",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:52:14.827Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-46",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}