{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-34",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:a042fa4c18499951e11eca03afaf5b46502568b2796cdc87597e1a5fd8421616",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 2000:34, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-2000-34",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-34",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 2000:34, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Vid bestämmande av förbehållsbelopp vid utmätning av lön har tillägg till Riksskatteverkets normalbelopp inte ansetts kunna göras för gäldenärens merkostnader till följd av gäldenärens dotters gymnasiestudier på annan ort.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 2000."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-34",
  "softwareVersion": "7d49c69e9210c23d",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-2000-34, RH 2000:34, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-34 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:d4372759072815a6, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2000-34/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:a042fa4c18499951e11eca03afaf5b46502568b2796cdc87597e1a5fd8421616",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:a042fa4c18499951e11eca03afaf5b46502568b2796cdc87597e1a5fd8421616",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:58:12.235Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2000-34",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}