{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-68",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:6054f8948f85e245d8eb70666b5ccd91bcad7259a67821ce461a47684280c64d",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1999:68, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1999-68",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-68",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1999:68, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Åtal för egenmäktighet med barn har därför ogillats.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Att vid gemensam vårdnad, mot den andra vårdnadshavarens vilja, hålla kvar ett barn på en plats dit barnet rest med båda vårdnadshavarnas samtycke, har inte ansetts vara att bedöma som ett sådant bortförande som är straffbelagt i 7 kap. 4 § första stycket andra meningen brottsbalken.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 1999."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-68",
  "softwareVersion": "70385219a88fb2e8",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1999-68, RH 1999:68, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-68 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:2aee7979a2979166, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1999-68/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:6054f8948f85e245d8eb70666b5ccd91bcad7259a67821ce461a47684280c64d",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:6054f8948f85e245d8eb70666b5ccd91bcad7259a67821ce461a47684280c64d",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T11:00:27.370Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-68",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}