{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-66",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:e7da993742712ad0eb7697c6ed07b862071b24e288e6f8a45c8d7c572499b046",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1999:66, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1999-66",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-66",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1999:66, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: När påföljden har bestämts till skyddstillsyn med särskild behandlingsplan (s.k. kontraktsvård) har det alternativa fängelsestraffet bestämts enbart utifrån den aktuella brottslighetens straffvärde utan beaktande av att det rörde sig om återfall i brott.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 1999."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-66",
  "softwareVersion": "b01ffc7a99a64a40",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1999-66, RH 1999:66, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-66 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:5ee2fb575bc38191, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1999-66/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:e7da993742712ad0eb7697c6ed07b862071b24e288e6f8a45c8d7c572499b046",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:e7da993742712ad0eb7697c6ed07b862071b24e288e6f8a45c8d7c572499b046",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:08:36.803Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-66",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}