{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-40",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:3aa0b7d50a0a53cfa35fa138b5c54ec8f818f9a5f62e64ef904052207140e4c4",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1999:40, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1999-40",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-40",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1999:40, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Ansökan av dödsbo, som företräds av boutredningsman, om rättshjälp har lämnats utan bifall eftersom dödsboet har ansetts kunna tillvarata sin rätt genom boutredningsmannen och därför inte ha behov av juridiskt biträde.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Västra Sverige, 1998."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-40",
  "softwareVersion": "32a1843749626fcb",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1999-40, RH 1999:40, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-40 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:dbe4fadeadf5099d, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1999-40/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:3aa0b7d50a0a53cfa35fa138b5c54ec8f818f9a5f62e64ef904052207140e4c4",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:3aa0b7d50a0a53cfa35fa138b5c54ec8f818f9a5f62e64ef904052207140e4c4",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:14:25.013Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-40",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}