{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-23",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:928fcaf05b824e1cf2132fd6de728cfa080e034e3661f047ec45254e54539be3",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1999:23, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1999-23",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-23",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1999:23, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Fråga om prövningstillstånd krävs för att hovrätt skall pröva ett mål som innefattar såväl en fullgörelsetalan om ca 18 000 kr som ett yrkande om att kärandens fordran skall utgå med särskild förmånsrätt i gäldenärens fastighet, i vilken gäldenären upplåtit panträtt till käranden.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Göta hovrätt, 1998."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-23",
  "softwareVersion": "1a09c8b6f57bee15",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1999-23, RH 1999:23, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-23 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:cdda5f8d5e56a4d7, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1999-23/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:928fcaf05b824e1cf2132fd6de728cfa080e034e3661f047ec45254e54539be3",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:928fcaf05b824e1cf2132fd6de728cfa080e034e3661f047ec45254e54539be3",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:08:53.135Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-23",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}