{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-21",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:18dd7be14e74b20dc4b8201e47af0642a975291eee049756f47747d36d1ed8a2",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1999:21, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1999-21",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-21",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1999:21, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Beviskravet i ett mål om rätt till sjukpension enligt en kollektiv pensionsförsäkring har bestämts så att det vid en helhetsbedömning skall framstå som klart mer sannolikt att ett försäkringsfall föreligger än att så inte är förhållandet.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 1999."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-21",
  "softwareVersion": "adb1f1c3259776d5",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1999-21, RH 1999:21, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-21 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:b30ff1d64cc67658, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1999-21/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:18dd7be14e74b20dc4b8201e47af0642a975291eee049756f47747d36d1ed8a2",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:18dd7be14e74b20dc4b8201e47af0642a975291eee049756f47747d36d1ed8a2",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:54:00.258Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-21",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}