{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-141",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:ceb98f5dc1e41f17aaf37f245a6d9a6887a46a04a1494d5548fcaf031bf9d023",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1999:141, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1999-141",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-141",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1999:141, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: När en speditör har anlitat ett rederi som undertransportör har en konossementsklausul inte ansetts medföra att retentionsrätt upplåtits av speditören för andra rederiets fordringar mot speditören än sådana som har samband med det befordrade godset.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Västra Sverige, 1999."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-141",
  "softwareVersion": "228351a56b50ac74",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1999-141, RH 1999:141, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-141 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:870b3d553b5cbe70, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1999-141/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:ceb98f5dc1e41f17aaf37f245a6d9a6887a46a04a1494d5548fcaf031bf9d023",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:ceb98f5dc1e41f17aaf37f245a6d9a6887a46a04a1494d5548fcaf031bf9d023",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T12:03:41.963Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-141",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}