{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-135",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:6a5dc15334376774558c8d7d6494d5d4bff23b04537d61ea0bb0b363fdcb890e",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1999:135, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1999-135",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-135",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1999:135, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Hovrätten har ansett att tilltalad, vars offentlige försvarare ringt till hovrättens växel och meddelat att han och den tilltalade på grund av bilköer var försenade till utsatt huvudförhandling, inte haft sådan giltig ursäkt för utevaro som utgör laga förfall.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 1999."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-135",
  "softwareVersion": "a7478162327a2759",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1999-135, RH 1999:135, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-135 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:e62f3a98c3645ff6, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1999-135/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:6a5dc15334376774558c8d7d6494d5d4bff23b04537d61ea0bb0b363fdcb890e",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:6a5dc15334376774558c8d7d6494d5d4bff23b04537d61ea0bb0b363fdcb890e",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T11:02:35.903Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-135",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}