{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-100",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:b833db7c614c49a26daf980596e1e6c55f719d9ef4208ecb738e8ef237a82a28",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1999:100, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1999-100",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-100",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1999:100, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Gemensam vårdnad har ansetts olämplig med hänsyn till den långvariga och vid prövningen av tvisten alltjämt bestående konflikten mellan barnens föräldrar samt till avsaknaden hos föräldrarna av en vilja till samförstånd.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 1999. Tillämpar Föräldrabalken."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-100",
  "softwareVersion": "760d971905b34109",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1999-100, RH 1999:100, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-100 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:5cb30badcd13cb1f, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1999-100/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:b833db7c614c49a26daf980596e1e6c55f719d9ef4208ecb738e8ef237a82a28",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:b833db7c614c49a26daf980596e1e6c55f719d9ef4208ecb738e8ef237a82a28",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T11:03:59.949Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1999-100",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}