{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-93",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:1900aa2ad422a532fd73839262cc21670e8e7d1b5ed3ff9a58e434af84f9d44f",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1998:93, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1998-93",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-93",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1998:93, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Brott mot 9 § privatinförsellagen har inte ansetts fullbordat när de medförda varorna påträffats vid visitation på kontrollstället, även om den resande tagits ut för tullkontroll efter den punkt, \"red point\", där val av fil inför kontrollen senast måste göras.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten över Skåne och Blekinge, 1998."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-93",
  "softwareVersion": "cda4e55684f17208",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1998-93, RH 1998:93, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-93 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:f29e10c564d960ee, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1998-93/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:1900aa2ad422a532fd73839262cc21670e8e7d1b5ed3ff9a58e434af84f9d44f",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:1900aa2ad422a532fd73839262cc21670e8e7d1b5ed3ff9a58e434af84f9d44f",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T11:58:38.967Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-93",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}