{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-64",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:d59867f4b47374192893be7f4e762c273e0cb866f423d3cec64f5d0efa842c2e",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1998:64, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1998-64",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-64",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1998:64, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Fråga om en person, som har ådragit sig skulder till följd av bl.a. spelberoende och som helt saknat försäkringsskydd, med hänsyn till sina ekonomiska och personliga förhållanden borde ha haft en rättsskyddsförsäkring. - Hinder har inte ansetts föreligga mot att bevilja rättshjälp.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 1998."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-64",
  "softwareVersion": "c258fdecd18aad38",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1998-64, RH 1998:64, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-64 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:6e83678a74490ca0, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1998-64/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:d59867f4b47374192893be7f4e762c273e0cb866f423d3cec64f5d0efa842c2e",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:d59867f4b47374192893be7f4e762c273e0cb866f423d3cec64f5d0efa842c2e",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T10:02:33.721Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-64",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}