{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-60",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:e1d9a1b7969f4682f4042ebe2864c52d062cf804d4979280aff5e122c02dcdcc",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1998:60, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1998-60",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-60",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1998:60, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: I samband med ett fastighetsköp utförde en besiktningsman för köparnas räkning en s.k. jordabalksbesiktning.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Sedermera konstaterades att takläckaget orsakat röt- och mögelangrepp. - Hovrätten fann att besiktningen var att anse som felaktig och att köparna till följd därav var berättigade till avdrag på det pris de betalat för den utförda tjänsten.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 1997."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-60",
  "softwareVersion": "0949505f3aab8f39",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1998-60, RH 1998:60, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-60 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:e89b587fff802924, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1998-60/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:e1d9a1b7969f4682f4042ebe2864c52d062cf804d4979280aff5e122c02dcdcc",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:e1d9a1b7969f4682f4042ebe2864c52d062cf804d4979280aff5e122c02dcdcc",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:13:15.476Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-60",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}