{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-41",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:3c2b69528eaf2aa9d24a91a2c6975f5bed4b6bd8c7148ebbe9c5b00bf952e7e0",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1998:41, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1998-41",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-41",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1998:41, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: När tingsrätt ombesörjt delgivning av tredskodom genom stämningsman har svaranden ansetts delgiven tredskodomen, till följd varav återvinningsfristen börjat löpa, oavsett om käranden begärt att tingsrätten skulle ombesörja delgivning eller inte.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten över Skåne och Blekinge, 1998."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-41",
  "softwareVersion": "cbd1782942b810a7",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1998-41, RH 1998:41, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-41 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:cd7d25945f52f102, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1998-41/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:3c2b69528eaf2aa9d24a91a2c6975f5bed4b6bd8c7148ebbe9c5b00bf952e7e0",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:3c2b69528eaf2aa9d24a91a2c6975f5bed4b6bd8c7148ebbe9c5b00bf952e7e0",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:05:58.836Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-41",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}