{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-23",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:93c55cb2d764f7b7013b4b16c1c5aa208654df6a26ac1a1dee1ca9486dba6803",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1998:23, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1998-23",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-23",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1998:23, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Dubbla, samtidiga vräkningsprocesser.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: En hyresvärd förde vid tingsrätten talan om fastställelse av att det inte fanns något giltigt hyresavtal med motparten samtidigt som han vid hyresnämnden ansökte om att hyresavtalet skulle upphöra vid hyrestidens utgång.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 1997."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-23",
  "softwareVersion": "ea185a177bf79865",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1998-23, RH 1998:23, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-23 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:f31910eddc430c36, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1998-23/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:93c55cb2d764f7b7013b4b16c1c5aa208654df6a26ac1a1dee1ca9486dba6803",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:93c55cb2d764f7b7013b4b16c1c5aa208654df6a26ac1a1dee1ca9486dba6803",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T11:57:46.370Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1998-23",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}