{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-90",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:451ebee3ef0252add885a05687d0b5a60a9ba8f8e1e6a1a0a4ac431548afb486",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1997:90, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1997-90",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-90",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1997:90, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Försök till varusmuggling avseende cigarretter, för vilka tull och avgifter skulle ha erlagts med tillsammans drygt 1,8 miljoner kr, har, med beaktande även av den förslagenhet med vilken brottet utförts, ansetts ha ett så högt straffvärde att det förelegat presumtion för fängelsestraff.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten över Skåne och Blekinge, 1997."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-90",
  "softwareVersion": "8c15b590cca76eaf",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1997-90, RH 1997:90, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-90 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:dd336ce1eba5f712, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1997-90/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:451ebee3ef0252add885a05687d0b5a60a9ba8f8e1e6a1a0a4ac431548afb486",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:451ebee3ef0252add885a05687d0b5a60a9ba8f8e1e6a1a0a4ac431548afb486",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:05:20.471Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-90",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}