{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-83",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:b2d565fa1001cc0e71caa29c88936b6c9481f00a9e2eb37551aa3d16207dbe1a",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1997:83, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1997-83",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-83",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1997:83, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: En danstillställning med ett par hundra deltagare vilken anordnats av en förening och kallats medlemsfest har, med hänsyn till bland annat det sätt på vilket biljetter och medlemskort sålts, ansetts som offentlig tillställning i ordningslagens mening.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Övre Norrland, 1997."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-83",
  "softwareVersion": "5cbbdd25461e8733",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1997-83, RH 1997:83, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-83 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:4a1b1534466c426e, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1997-83/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:b2d565fa1001cc0e71caa29c88936b6c9481f00a9e2eb37551aa3d16207dbe1a",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:b2d565fa1001cc0e71caa29c88936b6c9481f00a9e2eb37551aa3d16207dbe1a",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:10:14.796Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-83",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}