{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-80",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:dc385aa04318b92fe312d7e1cfad4adf7f7b28cfe09c963d479535c39031eef0",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1997:80, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1997-80",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-80",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1997:80, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: När frågan om beviljande av rättshjälp angår samma omständigheter som den bakomliggande tvist, vilken rättshjälpsansökan avser, bör begäran om rättshjälp avslås, endast om det föreligger särskilda skäl.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten över Skåne och Blekinge, 1997."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-80",
  "softwareVersion": "290e69d7d5051147",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1997-80, RH 1997:80, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-80 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:d3dccff4690d0932, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1997-80/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:dc385aa04318b92fe312d7e1cfad4adf7f7b28cfe09c963d479535c39031eef0",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:dc385aa04318b92fe312d7e1cfad4adf7f7b28cfe09c963d479535c39031eef0",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:06:12.380Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-80",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}