{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-69",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:0c35927644482ab5040a50056a980997af3862f06a2fa3b53a0fad75f58d22f9",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1997:69, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1997-69",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-69",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1997:69, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Vid gärningstillfället har införsel av alkohol som ej tillkännagetts för tullmyndigheten straffbelagts som varusmuggling.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Gärningen har bedömts som brott mot privatinförsellagen då detta brott har lett till lindrigare straff och tullagstiftningen inte bedömts gälla under viss tid på grund av då rådande särskilda förhållanden.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten över Skåne och Blekinge, 1997."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-69",
  "softwareVersion": "39730303e7c3e1b7",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1997-69, RH 1997:69, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-69 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:21b48bcd19e48ea0, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1997-69/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:0c35927644482ab5040a50056a980997af3862f06a2fa3b53a0fad75f58d22f9",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:0c35927644482ab5040a50056a980997af3862f06a2fa3b53a0fad75f58d22f9",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:06:11.893Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-69",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}