{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-67",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:597eb93753cae3a556a375f819094009223d47625e0fcaff3946b5e2dfe68d79",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1997:67, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1997-67",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-67",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1997:67, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Hyresnämndsmål.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: När en hyresgäst och medlemmar av hans familj behövt använda en s.k. sidolägenhet för att återhämta sig från en mycket påfrestande och prövande verksamhet med institutionsvård, som hyresgästen och hans maka bedrev i den permanenta bostaden, har prövningslägenheten ansetts tillgodose ett reellt bostadsbehov.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätts hyresrättsliga avgöranden, 1997."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-67",
  "softwareVersion": "ed2079732a3a7cbe",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1997-67, RH 1997:67, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-67 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:630986fa93df0ff2, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1997-67/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:597eb93753cae3a556a375f819094009223d47625e0fcaff3946b5e2dfe68d79",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:597eb93753cae3a556a375f819094009223d47625e0fcaff3946b5e2dfe68d79",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:11:42.019Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-67",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}