{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-47",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:bad03891b0bafb5512538c33d166b3b61e88da12ce1718c2ae3d9748e43ca5be",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1997:47, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1997-47",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-47",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1997:47, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Det i lagen (1947:164) om förbud mot politiska uniformer stadgade förbudet om bärande av uniform eller liknande klädedräkt, som tjänar att utmärka bärarens politiska meningsriktning m.m. har vid prövning av brott mot lagen befunnits ej vara förenligt med regeringsformens bestämmelser till skydd för yttrandefriheten.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Västra Sverige, 1996."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-47",
  "softwareVersion": "f2df7cd0fddb56fa",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1997-47, RH 1997:47, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-47 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:2ecbfe0b4024c3ba, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1997-47/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:bad03891b0bafb5512538c33d166b3b61e88da12ce1718c2ae3d9748e43ca5be",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:bad03891b0bafb5512538c33d166b3b61e88da12ce1718c2ae3d9748e43ca5be",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:05:20.186Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-47",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}