{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-2",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:b21255da4194dd893f19164b88d1c60ab6346d765972af9b7b9bfcc6139fb5d2",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1997:2, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1997-2",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-2",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1997:2, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Staten har befunnits ej ha gjort sig skyldig till fel eller försummelse vid myndighetsutövning då fastighetsägare, som hos länsbostadsnämnd haft ett pågående ärende om statligt bostadslån, av länsbostadsnämnden ej informerats om sista dag för ansökan om statligt investeringsbidrag.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Göta hovrätt, 1995."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-2",
  "softwareVersion": "7bc5ba9a2a4bede6",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1997-2, RH 1997:2, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-2 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:9fc00a985e1620b5, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1997-2/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:b21255da4194dd893f19164b88d1c60ab6346d765972af9b7b9bfcc6139fb5d2",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:b21255da4194dd893f19164b88d1c60ab6346d765972af9b7b9bfcc6139fb5d2",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:04:26.616Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-2",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}