{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-19",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:21206f6bab8537d59396f2923d6a177c62aa51715fc85fd6a71bf535f1647866",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1997:19, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1997-19",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-19",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1997:19, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Bestämmelsen i 12 kap. 25 § jordabalken om att hyresgäst vid sin användning av hyreslägenheten skall iaktta allt som fordras för att bevara gott skick inom fastigheten har ansetts tillämplig på hot från hyresgästs sida mot hyresvärdens personal när handlingen haft samband med deras förvaltning av fastigheten.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätts hyresrättsliga avgöranden, 1996."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-19",
  "softwareVersion": "74d2750cb4cc1daa",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1997-19, RH 1997:19, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-19 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:da90bf511e568286, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1997-19/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:21206f6bab8537d59396f2923d6a177c62aa51715fc85fd6a71bf535f1647866",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:21206f6bab8537d59396f2923d6a177c62aa51715fc85fd6a71bf535f1647866",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T10:03:25.732Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-19",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}