{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-17",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:d0e207bfe0cf9d298092b0a9cfebcfa3479bcaf79b2cf21fc1471003733c79a5",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1997:17, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1997-17",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-17",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1997:17, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Vid bedömningen har beaktats att vittneskallelsen varit bristfällig i fråga om information angående förskottsbetalning.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Vite har undanröjts med hänsyn till att laga förfall ansetts föreligga för vittnes utevaro vid huvudförhandling på grund av att part underlåtit att betala förskott till vittnet.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 1997."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-17",
  "softwareVersion": "6154ee97f61dfdb2",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1997-17, RH 1997:17, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-17 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:7d50b0074d10bf95, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1997-17/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:d0e207bfe0cf9d298092b0a9cfebcfa3479bcaf79b2cf21fc1471003733c79a5",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:d0e207bfe0cf9d298092b0a9cfebcfa3479bcaf79b2cf21fc1471003733c79a5",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:11:40.437Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-17",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}