{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-16",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:b21c52f14a215faa7e294e794fb23faa8aa96302e4a5c954a589a08fd7a93e40",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1997:16, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1997-16",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-16",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1997:16, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Fastighetsmäklare har vid förmedling av fastighetsköp handlat i strid med god fastighetsmäklarsed när han inte förvissat sig om hur det förhållit sig med lånen, utan istället låtit köparna av fastigheten underteckna köpekontraktet utan att villkora köpet.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Nedre Norrland, 1996."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-16",
  "softwareVersion": "148325c0707410c5",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1997-16, RH 1997:16, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-16 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:e9c7d654f565106f, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1997-16/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:b21c52f14a215faa7e294e794fb23faa8aa96302e4a5c954a589a08fd7a93e40",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:b21c52f14a215faa7e294e794fb23faa8aa96302e4a5c954a589a08fd7a93e40",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T11:56:27.422Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-16",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}