{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-15",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:7784ac4991595709cf27a8317545faf906b47af823da7a9eb25abab09dbff07b",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1997:15, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1997-15",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-15",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1997:15, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: När betydande skulder uppkommit genom borgensåtaganden som gäldenären befunnits ha ingått utan vare sig förmåga eller avsikt att infria dem, har det inte ansetts skäligt att bevilja skuldsanering.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Västra Sverige, 1996."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-15",
  "softwareVersion": "3eb0256aa3d1318c",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1997-15, RH 1997:15, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-15 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:4cdd0f676393f267, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1997-15/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:7784ac4991595709cf27a8317545faf906b47af823da7a9eb25abab09dbff07b",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:7784ac4991595709cf27a8317545faf906b47af823da7a9eb25abab09dbff07b",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T09:06:56.182Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-15",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}