{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-121",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:974b2f41a8edc37f0a5cf687057f4faf75735ceab055373adaa2eceadf1ac191",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1997:121, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1997-121",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-121",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1997:121, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: En guldsmed rånades i sin butik.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: I försäkringstvist med anledning av rånet ansågs ett villkor om inbrottsförsäkring, som gav rätt till högre ersättning än ett villkor om rånförsäkring, tillämpligt oavsett om även villkoret om rånförsäkring var tillämpligt.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 1997."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-121",
  "softwareVersion": "d6e407f37a8d23e2",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1997-121, RH 1997:121, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-121 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:0b41187f2081f0ef, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1997-121/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:974b2f41a8edc37f0a5cf687057f4faf75735ceab055373adaa2eceadf1ac191",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:974b2f41a8edc37f0a5cf687057f4faf75735ceab055373adaa2eceadf1ac191",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:11:39.017Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-121",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}