{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-117",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:84c91143ea69a5d6712b9c68137e34337ec33e808a2f3a2c45f6f797c4569f3b",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1997:117, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1997-117",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-117",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1997:117, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Fråga om nyttjande av tjänstebil för privata körningar har varit att betrakta som olovligt brukande har besvarats nekande, eftersom det varit förutsatt att bilen skulle kunna nyttjas som en förmånsbil och det inte förelegat uppsåt att använda den olovligt.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 1997."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-117",
  "softwareVersion": "08a9f144ea729356",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1997-117, RH 1997:117, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-117 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:aa86865919b40450, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1997-117/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:84c91143ea69a5d6712b9c68137e34337ec33e808a2f3a2c45f6f797c4569f3b",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:84c91143ea69a5d6712b9c68137e34337ec33e808a2f3a2c45f6f797c4569f3b",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T10:05:04.499Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1997-117",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}