{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-83",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:871e6c539256714a6c02ab19243d43980aa35b8c3538d26982332d338c945581",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1996:83, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1996-83",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-83",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1996:83, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Kronofogdemyndigheten har ansetts äga rätt att utan lagstöd fatta ett interimistiskt beslut om förordnande av syssloman och beslutet har befunnits vara inte endast av förberedande karaktär till följd varav gäldenären haft rätt att överklaga beslutet.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Övre Norrland, 1996."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-83",
  "softwareVersion": "8a452651ee63ca46",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1996-83, RH 1996:83, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-83 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:bcaa6da4e99c9d48, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1996-83/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:871e6c539256714a6c02ab19243d43980aa35b8c3538d26982332d338c945581",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:871e6c539256714a6c02ab19243d43980aa35b8c3538d26982332d338c945581",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:15:19.953Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-83",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}