{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-72",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:1c6a75c372c2a9f28e56221f921ade26f2b1f0160d1ebd5a29fe1001b22fe2db",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1996:72, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1996-72",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-72",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1996:72, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: I mål om skuldsanering har förelegat sådana svårigheter att göra en någorlunda säker prognos avseende sökandens förmåga att inom en överskådlig tid betala sina skulder, att förutsättningar saknats för att bevilja honom skuldsanering.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Nedre Norrland, 1996."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-72",
  "softwareVersion": "9e71a3ace0805a1c",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1996-72, RH 1996:72, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-72 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:85f2ee5915b4af34, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1996-72/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:1c6a75c372c2a9f28e56221f921ade26f2b1f0160d1ebd5a29fe1001b22fe2db",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:1c6a75c372c2a9f28e56221f921ade26f2b1f0160d1ebd5a29fe1001b22fe2db",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:13:53.557Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-72",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}