{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-69",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:7dcd5468d96d86073e63ab9a319b442a09188d3acb47e291d954ef67380f837e",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1996:69, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1996-69",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-69",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "Fråga om ansvar för s.k. dödshjälp",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Ett åtal för dråp har ogillats eftersom den åtalades handlande inte inneburit annat än att hon möjliggjort för annan person att vidta de åtgärder som ledde till den personens död.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 1996."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-69",
  "softwareVersion": "4d50420e4b30c7c9",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1996-69, RH 1996:69, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-69 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:41be610ec6ffe0cb, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1996-69/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:7dcd5468d96d86073e63ab9a319b442a09188d3acb47e291d954ef67380f837e",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:7dcd5468d96d86073e63ab9a319b442a09188d3acb47e291d954ef67380f837e",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T07:13:13.736Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-69",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}