{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-24",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:be79dbef0fc80e55059c867d274337272432386b3778fa88efb1487971c8f79c",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1996:24, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1996-24",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-24",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1996:24, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: En polisman ingrep tillsammans med en kollega mot en person, som hade gjort sig skyldig till olaga intrång, genom att med bil föra bort denne en längre sträcka från platsen för brottet.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Polismannen, som liksom kollegan hade dömts av tingsrätten för olaga frihetsberövande, dömdes av hovrätten för tjänstefel.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 1996."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-24",
  "softwareVersion": "f3e93699d5440a68",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1996-24, RH 1996:24, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-24 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:3c36bf27a302aca0, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1996-24/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:be79dbef0fc80e55059c867d274337272432386b3778fa88efb1487971c8f79c",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:be79dbef0fc80e55059c867d274337272432386b3778fa88efb1487971c8f79c",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T08:15:07.332Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-24",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}