{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-154",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:15617b2da7944e0330b263e8660f9f6425a8e73a020f8ad8516b4a3a8834a858",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1996:154, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1996-154",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-154",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1996:154, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad som hände: Käromålet har dock ogillats eftersom det inte förelegat skadeståndsgrundande uppsåt eller oaktsamhet.",
    "Vad domstolen sa: Formföreskrifterna vid köp av fast egendom har inte ansetts utgöra hinder mot att ålägga en avtalskontrahent skadeståndsskyldighet p.g.a. vållande under förhandlingar som inte lett till giltigt avtal.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Hovrätten för Övre Norrland, 1995."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-154",
  "softwareVersion": "fa07d7ef467a5ab0",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1996-154, RH 1996:154, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-154 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:c6a9caf2aeaf1fea, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1996-154/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:15617b2da7944e0330b263e8660f9f6425a8e73a020f8ad8516b4a3a8834a858",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:15617b2da7944e0330b263e8660f9f6425a8e73a020f8ad8516b4a3a8834a858",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T11:01:04.445Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-154",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}