{
  "attribution": {
    "source": "legal.exploreworldai.com",
    "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-146",
    "license": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision",
    "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
    "proof": "sha256:b82251b4340e683b0c0bbcdbe8674147e2dbe6155790e408a96ac836a99195b4",
    "jurisdiction": "eu"
  },
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "applicationCategory": "LegalService",
  "name": "RH 1996:146, beslutsagent",
  "identifier": "avgorande-rh-1996-146",
  "url": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-146",
  "inLanguage": "sv",
  "about": "RH 1996:146, beslutsagent",
  "abstract": [
    "Vad domstolen sa: Skuldsanering ansågs inte utesluten enbart på grund av att gäldenärens sambo var lagfaren ägare till tre fastigheter med ett sammanlagt taxeringsvärde om 126 000 kr och belånade för 178 500 kr.",
    "Varför det spelar roll: Avgörande från Svea hovrätt, 1996."
  ],
  "isBasedOn": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-146",
  "softwareVersion": "39b82a01b2967526",
  "citation": "avgorande-rh-1996-146, RH 1996:146, beslutsagent. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-146 (hämtad 2026-08-29, bevis sha256:faf8bad03b728730, bygge legal-2026-08-25).",
  "disclaimer": "Källhänvisning med officiell identifierare. Ingen juridisk rådgivning och inget efterlevnadsbeslut.",
  "potentialAction": {
    "@type": "SearchAction",
    "target": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1996-146/run?{&samma_lagrum,samma_instans,avgorande_ar_senare}"
  },
  "language": "sv",
  "source_language": "sv",
  "text_language": "sv",
  "available_languages": [
    "sv",
    "en",
    "no",
    "de"
  ],
  "translated_views": [
    "manifest.json",
    "ai.json"
  ],
  "source_only_views": [
    "script.json",
    "run",
    "monitor.json",
    "verify"
  ],
  "translated": false,
  "hash": "sha256:b82251b4340e683b0c0bbcdbe8674147e2dbe6155790e408a96ac836a99195b4",
  "version": "legal-2026-08-25",
  "expires": "2026-08-31T00:00:00.000Z",
  "dependency": {
    "index_version": "legal-2026-08-25+legal-2026-08-25+2026-08-25T10:00:00",
    "content_hash": "sha256:b82251b4340e683b0c0bbcdbe8674147e2dbe6155790e408a96ac836a99195b4",
    "revalidate_after": "2026-08-30T06:08:39.770Z",
    "max_copy_age_seconds": 3600,
    "policy": "revalidate-required; live-fetch-per-answer; attribution-required; no-derived-index",
    "changelog": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency",
    "verify": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify",
    "stale_copy_invalid": true
  },
  "canonical": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1996-146",
  "usageInfo": "https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering"
}